For those of you who have woken up every morning, checking the polling of your favorite candidate in the middle of August, please allow me to serve as your honorary health professional. Don’t panic! Don’t let your blood pressure build. September polling doesn’t matter. In the first week of September, 2011, Rick Perry was polling at 30%, Mitt Romney at 23%, Michele Bachmann at 12%, and Ron Paul at 7%. By primary day in Virginia, only Mitt Romney and Ron Paul were on the ballot. Ron Paul got 40% of the vote.
In the third week of October in 2011, a CBS/New York Times poll showed Herman Cain was polling at 25% and Mitt Romney at 21%,
By November, Public Policy Polling showed Newt Gingrich in the lead with 28%, Herman Cain at 25%, Mitt Romney at 18%, and Rick Perry at 6%. Perry went from 30% to 6% in two months.
There’s reason to think that if Cain continues to fade, Gingrich will continue to gain. Among Cain’s supporters 73% have a favorable opinion of Gingrich to only 21% with a negative one. That compares to a 33/55 spread for Romney with Cain voters and a 32/53 one for Perry.
Riding a wave of momentum from his trio of victories on Tuesday Rick Santorum has opened up a wide lead in PPP’s newest national poll. He’s at 38% to 23% for Mitt Romney, 17% for Newt Gingrich, and 13% for Ron Paul. Part of the reason for Santorum’s surge is his own high level of popularity. 64% of voters see him favorably to only 22% with a negative one. But the other, and maybe more important, reason is that Republicans are significantly souring on both Romney and Gingrich. Romney’s favorability is barely above water at 44/43, representing a 23 point net decline from our December national poll when he as +24 (55/31). Gingrich has fallen even further. A 44% plurality of GOP voters now hold a negative opinion of him to only 42% with a positive one. That’s a 34 point drop from 2 months ago when he was at +32 (60/28).
The Iowa Caucus were held in January. This is important to note, because Rick Santorum’s Iowa Caucus victory may not have propelled him to the Republican Nomination, but it did catapult him in the polls. In New Hampshire, Mitt Romney beat out Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman. This second place finish in New Hampshire kept the Paul Campaign alive. By February, Ron Paul was behind the three most consistently well-polling candidates (Gingrich, Romney, and Santorum). So New Hampshire matters, but it doesn’t guarantee victory. In South Carolina, Newt Gingrich got 40% of the vote! Again, we’re still seeing the same top 4 candidates. But be assured, South Carolina won’t nominate the same candidate Iowa or New Hampshire nominate.
Two Months later, by April 2012, Mitt Romney was polling in the 50% range, with comfortable 30 point spreads.
Don’t worry so much about September polls. Follow your candidates. You want them polling in the top 3 in Iowa, top 4 in New Hampshire, and top 5 in South Carolina by January. The Iowa Caucus will be held in February next year. Until then, if you really want to judge the quality of your favorite candidates, follow these 5 important measures: 1. Fund-raising from small donors. 2. Do they have active campaign teams set up? and in how many States? 3. On how many States are they on the ballot? 4. Are they running a quality campaign? 5. Are they mired in turmoil?
It’s September 1st. If your candidate of choice is raking in large amounts of small donor contributions, are active in the majority of early states, have campaign teams and staffs in those states, are actively working to get on the ballots, are focused, on message, and free of disastrous political blunders, then you’re candidate is going to be just fine. Don’t panic. Breathe. For the love of God, turn off Fox News and take some evening walks with your spouse or your trusty canine companion. 2016 isn’t here yet.
Article written by: Steven Brodie Tucker