I am truly undecided this election. I am almost ready out of frustration to vote a protest vote for Governor Jim Gilmore. But one person I will not – cannot vote for – is Senator Marco Rubio. Trying to wrap himself in the Reagan mantle, Rubio is no Reagan.
Rubio already stated he approved of President Bush (43) going to war to enforce United Nations resolutions in Iraq.
Rubio also objected to (in the South Carolina debate) the Syria Obama resolution not because it is none of our business but because it did not do enough to take out the Assad regime (and he cited as truthful the allegation that Syria used chemical weapons on the rebels) – that is not a Reagan solution.
In the debate last evening on Libya (from this text):
RUBIO: Yes, a couple of points. Number one, on the Libya situation, we didn’t topple Gadhafi, the Libyan people toppled Gadhafi. The only choice before America that this president had to make is, does it happen quickly or does it take a long time?
And I argued if it takes a long time, you’re going to have rebel forces emerge like these radical Islamists to take advantage of the vacuum. And that’s what happened. That’s where the term “lead from behind” came. And that’s the foreign policy that apparently Senator Cruz appears to agree with.
Meddling! More meddling! NONE OF OUR BUSINESS! And it seems Rubio was against drafting women and for it at the same time:
He’s previously said Selective Service should be opened up to women, but on Friday Marco Rubio said he was against drafting women into combat.
“I do not support drafting women and forcing them to be combat soldiers. I don’t support that. I never have and I don’t now,’ Rubio said at the Faith and Family Forum in Greenville, South Carolina.
Rubio’s words had social media abuzz — many accusing him of flip-flopping — given the response he gave to a question on Selective Service at the ABC News debate just a week ago.
“I do believe that Selective Service should be opened up for both men and women in case a draft is ever instituted,” he told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz in Manchester, New Hampshire.
I cannot imagine Ronald Reagan would be for this. No, Senator Rubio is a neocon. I am tired of meddling wars under the guise of “American leadership in the world”; not every nation thinks US leadership in the world. Ask a Serb.
I am agonizing over this vote. I think the best one in the race is Dr. Ben Carson and I’ll decide Monday if I will vote for him or another candidate. But it won’t be Senator Rubio. (It also won’t be Governor Kasich for this in the last debate where is wanted to also support the Syrian rebels – after he said he did not like civil wars in the SC debate):
KASICH: There’s something — I want to — I want to point out something here today that is — it’s so critically important — about how the Obama administration has really done such a ridiculous, feckless job here in foreign policy.
First of all, we should have been supporting the rebels long ago. They could have taken Assad out, and because we did nothing, the Russians are in, and they’re sitting in the catbird seat.
We should have been helping them. I’m thankful that the aid trucks are finally getting into Syria. But the fact is, had we had acted, we would have solved that problem.
I have issue with Donald Trump but he at least called out the Bush failed policies in the SC debate. Just remember who said it first – the other great Ronald: Dr. Ron Paul.
Article written by: Elwood "Sandy" Sanders