All posts by tjwhitejr

President Trump and Senate Should Wait on the Supreme Court Appointment

TEMPTING! BUT NO!

It is very tempting – let’s stop here for a minute or two before we get into the politics of the appointment and honor Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – I disagreed with her positions on the Court very much – but like Justice Scalia, Ginsburg was true to her principles. I actually did not approve of her public remarks on political questions and if I had been in Congress, I would have called for at least a censure if not impeachment for that. But Ruth Bader Ginsburg became something that happens to almost no judge, and few if any aspire to: Folk hero. She was in a children’s cartoon (I want to say Clarence) as the really dorky smart kid – Clarence’s best friend – Jeff who has a square face – clever pun! – who watched the judge shows and had dolls from famous Justices of the Supreme Court and one was Ginsburg (The other two were Justice Scalia and Chief Justice Roberts I think) and the plot line was based on the other kids playing with the Ginsburg doll and broke it. What to do? Ethical dilemma… Justice Ginsburg even had a nickname: Notorious RBG. When you are known by your initials: FDR, JFK, LBJ, even AOC – you are in a different status in American politics. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is even on tee shirts! Almost a little irreverent.

So people should rent or watch On The Basis of Sex this weekend – It is as interesting as a fictional legal thriller – and a clever ruse – they found an obscure section of the income tax code that discriminated against men and a plaintiff worthy of admiration. And Ruth Bader Ginsburg was almost too shy to argue a case in front of the Tenth Circuit. Amazing. (There is also that scene where the young newlywed Ginsburgs were about to start a sex scene because of who it was I was a bit embarrassed!) Made me think about the ERA a bit. I could see why people thought then it was needed. But not today.

Now back to politics: I thought Judge Merrick Garland should have gotten a hearing (noted here at this blog) but not appointed to the Court. But if the precedent was established, it is wrong to change it for political expediency. There will be a backlash and that might be packing the Court. Let it ride until January. The President can appoint if he chooses. Challenge the former Vice President to state some people he would consider. But no vote until January. And remember, conservatives: VOTE!

Ruth, NOBODY cares what your “dying wish” was—if there even really was one.

Ruth, NOBODY cares what your “dying wish” was—if there even really was one.

A SHORT ARTICLE BY JEFFREY A FRIEDBERG, who does not do “polite analysis.” Who only reports what he already “knows” as The Truth.

Jeffrey A. Friedberg
Jeffrey A. Friedberg, AI EXPERIMENT 52

<<<———————————————>>>

“Hurry up, please, it’s time….” T.S. Eliot

The several people I have known dying with what Ruth reportedly had were so doped up with pain killers and other drugs they had ZERO idea what they were saying or talking about. They were vegetables or raving.

So Ruth, I do NOT believe this alleged “death bed wish” you so nicely and literarily well-stated. I do NOT believe you said anything at all. I think it is a lie.

I think you are being represented in this your death by liars.

As far as Trump?

Trump undoubtedly had intel last week that Ruth was dying. He therefore floated several nominees for SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the Untried States,) among these may be Cruz and Cotton.

Democrats: YOU DON’T CARE: you were ALREADY rioting, and you stated you planned to just continue rioting.

Conserves: you were already watching hard and deciding.

Ruth: I do NOT believe this “death bed statement” you are said to have made.

AND, AS FAR AS  EL SEÑOR DONALDO?

Donald Trump now HAS to proceed with a nominee. Trump HAS to get out ahead of the interminable democrat riots, burnings, and murders. He HAS to be seen taking action RIGHT NOW.

He at least must begin a process—be seen as moving on this topic.

Trump must therefore be political, or practical.

Or guess what?

NOBODY will vote for Donald Trump.

Nobody.

And he knows this very well….

…the same way even Eye know it.

.

Make Change: Mike Dickinson for Richmond City Council 1st District 2020

Used to worship people’s thought, I ain’t carin’ no more

They say I changed and that I ain’t the same as before

They keep you locked in the box like they don’t want you to grow

Just know a God’s in the room when you walk through the door”

New York Nights Intro

Roy Revolution

Change as a verb means “to make or become different” as a noun means “the act or instance of making or becoming different”.

Major things sometimes have to happen in life in order to promote change in people. People hit rockbottom with drugs and or alcohol in order to change and become clean. Some people have a near death experience. Some have become born again. Whatever it is that makes change know that it is a powerful dynamic.

Mike Dickinson is the Republican Candidate for Richmond City Council District 1. I know that many of my readers are like, “wait a minute?! A Republican candidate running in the City of Richmond?!”

Yes, Mike Dickinson is the lone Republican in the race. Taking a look at the make up of Richmond’s 1st District, it is the only district in the city which President Trump won in 2016. It is possible that Mike Dickinson could become the lone conservative voice on the Richmond City Council.

In his bio, Mike Dickinson says the following, 

“My name is Michael Dickinson. Born in Richmond. Small business owner. 3-time VCU alumni (Bachelor’s in Criminal Justice, Masters in Urban Planning and a Phd in Public Policy). 

I decided to run for Richmond City Council because of the dire condition the city is in. The local leadership in Richmond has vanished. The Mayor and current City Council have been nowhere to be seen during the last months of unrest, leaving citizens and small business owners to fend for themselves! 

I have not always been a Republican, in my younger days I THOUGHT I was a Democrat. As I had life experiences running small businesses, meeting a missionary and journeying to God, my father passing away, coming to terms with my own mortality, and the democrat party becoming the party of aggrieved people rather than that of hard working people my views shifted. Plus President Trump brought me to the party with his America first non-apologetic style and his business sense. 

The biggest priority for the City of Richmond is that we need to restore order, provide leadership, and support our police. The protestors do not even KNOW what they are protesting- they protest Monuments and the Police Department – YET ignore the 50 years of neglect to city schools by democratic leadership! Time and time again democrats have bought shiny new things with taxpayer money at the expense of city students! Thats where the injustice is. We have 100 year old schools with rats and no air conditioning and democrat mayors like Levar Stoney, Tim Kaine, and Dwight Jones would rather fund Redskin training fields (11 million) and Breweries (33 million).  Even this year the current budget is filled with waste! Anyone, with any level of business experience, could easily cut 10-15% off of it without making difficult choices. Good example is 550k for a press office?

Instead of taking care of what we have, the democrat solution has time and time again be to build something new or to create a new tax. In the past few years my First District opponent has voted repeatedly with the mayor to raise taxes on property owners and businesses.

My priorities if elected will be to run the City as a business. Reduce business taxes. Reduce property taxes. Fix the schools. Support the police. Most importantly- stand up and act like a leader and not hide for 3 days as the city burns (what our mayor and city council members did) and yet they have not cleaned up any of the graffiti or vandalism.”

One of the most impressive things about Mike Dickinson in my opinion is that over the Labor Day Weekend he connected with VA 2A For Preservations Lovers. The Chesterfield County base second amendment rights organization. Together the group of concerned Virginians conducted graffiti removal from the concrete bases where the Confederate Statues once stood. Cleaning Graffiti with Strength & Unity in VA  is a Go Fund Me group created by VA 2A Preservation Lovers. Since August 11, 2020 the community and Neighbors have raised $5,571.00. 

So, to the constituents of the 1st District. What is it going to be for 2020 and beyond? You all have the ability to make change here and now. You all should take a chance and do it.

Nick Freitas Is Going to Have to FIGHT!

Spanberger Needs to Repudiate the Lies of her Supporters!

It’s started again: the pre-existing condition lie. Instead of trying to expand insurance coverage to more people, the Dems are reviving the lie about pre-exisitng conditions. Read these posts to learn more.

Now the pipefitters union came up with a severely misleading ad about pregnancy. It alleges that Freitas voted to allow employers to fire people for being pregnant. Well, guess what, pipefitters union, it’s been illegal under federal law to fire a person for being pregnant! Since 1978!

The bill Freitas voted again would have extended state civil rights law to pregnancy. Now it is certainly debatable if people need more protections under state law or is that too much bureaucracy when there is a federal remedy but that is a far cry from voting to allow employers to FIRE a person for being pregnant.

Nick Freitas needs to put out this ad:

I’m Nick Freitas and I call on my opponent to repudiate the lying and misleading ads stating I voted to deny people insurance if they have pre-existing conditions and that I voted to authorize employers to fire people for being pregnant. It’s been illegal under federal law since 1978 to fire an employee for being pregnant. Cong. Spanberger talks about her integrity. A person with integrity would immediately repudiate those ads and ask those PACs to stop running them.

And the next ad has to be about impeachment. Something with a line like this:

Instead of dealing with the nascent coronavirus, Cong. Spanberger voted to impeach President Trump for what amounts to a “nothingburger”.

We saw what happened last year with Republicans who wouldn’t fight. Ask Senator Sturtevant.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg — first thoughts and Open Thread

I’m abandoning the rule about not speaking ill of the dead. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a politician in robes and we’re in a political season.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died. These are my first, rough thoughts, and they’re not in any particular order. I’ve also skipped hyperlinks, although I’m pretty sure my facts are correct or, at least, correct enough. Please feel free to add your thoughts to the comments.

1. My thoughts are with her family. Losing the mama and the matriarch is a painful thing, even if you’ve known it was coming. Having said that, let’s talk about the public figure, not the private person. And considering that everything Ginsburg did was political, this seems appropriate.

2. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an appalling anti-constitutionalist, who always put her politics ahead of both the constitution and the law.

3. All of the leftist and RINO encomiums for her refer to her “fighting” for “equality and justice.” The mere fact that they can say that proves what an awful judge she was. If you’re “fighting” for “equality and justice,” you’re a politician. As a justice on the United States Supreme Court, Ginsburg’s focus should always have been on the Constitution. Had she had any respect for her job, she would have understood that it was for the voters and their representatives to “fight” for equality and justice. Her political side also showed in the fact that, disgracefully, she voiced an opinion in the 2016 election.

4. A good judicial opinion relies on the solid building blocks of precedent and statutory authority. The decision then rises clean and strong, like a house made of the finest materials, standing firmly on a stone foundation, with that stone being the Constitution. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially on issues that mattered to the left, were amalgams of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together in a rough simulacrum of a shack. Ginsburg and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never quite on point. Ginsburg’s decisions were one of the reasons I became a conservative. As a lawyer, I realized that she could reach the conclusions she did only through dishonesty and judicial sleight of hand. If she couldn’t reach those “principled” conclusions honestly, how principled were they?

5. Ginsburg long ago gave the game away on abortion. She knew that it wasn’t about giving women choices and making their lives better. Instead, as she said, it was about getting rid of population groups that Ginsburg and her elite, most white, leftists didn’t want around. Ginsburg didn’t frame it in terms of race, but it certainly worked out that.

6. Ginsburg had no respect for the Constitution she was sworn to defend. I have a link somewhere of Ginsburg saying that, if she had the choice, she would have done it differently. She didn’t say so explicitly, but she implied that doesn’t like our Constitution because it is built upon a weak(ish) central government and inherent individual rights. She would prefer something along the lines of the EU’s constitution, which has a massive centralized government micromanaging individual lives, with “rights” being predicated upon people’s relative situation vis-a-vis the government class’s preferences. Moreover, despite being labeled as rights, they’re clearly mere privileges that the government can bestow and withdraw as it wishes.

7. Ginsburg’s politicizing the Court is part of why we’re at the situation we are today, where a Justice’s death can throw an upcoming election into an uproar. When judges legislate, as she and her fellow leftists on the Court have been doing, the Court takes on oversized importance. For decades, leftists who couldn’t get their fellow citizens to vote on their policies were able to use the Court as a super-legislative body. This is not what the Constitution intended, and it means that we Americans are being ruled by a cabal of 9 people who hold their positions for life. They are, in essence, a form of non-democratic absolute monarchy.

8. Ginsburg was a terribly selfish lady. Apparently she said on her deathbed that she didn’t want Trump to nominate her successor. If she didn’t want a Republican to do that, she should have retired on Obama’s watch. At the very least, despite a Republican Senate (it was Republican in his last two years, right?), Obama could still have pushed through a mildly leftist judge. After all, the Senate was a RINO funhouse then and, if Obama had nominated a black man, even a communist, they would have said yes.

9. Mitch McConnell apparently sent out the message that he stands ready to confirm whomever Trump nominates right now. The problem is that Lisa Murkowski has already said she won’t do anything until the inauguration. Mitt Romney has proven that he will always place his ego over the good of the country, proving that he’s McCain’s spiritual heir. Why, oh why, do voters choose such awful, weak people. There’s also speculation that Susan Collins is in a tough race, implying that she can’t win if she votes for a new Supreme Court Justice in the next 45 days. My current thinking is that a conservative Supreme Court nominee is more important even than a Republican majority in the Senate in the next term. We might be able to survive a “Harris/Biden” administration, but I don’t know that we can survive a Harris/Biden administration and a strong leftist Supreme Court. That means that Collins should put her country ahead of her career.

10. We have to brace for the storm. Combine the Ferguson riots with the George Floyd riots with the Kavanaugh madness, and you will have a rough sense of the temper tantrum the left will throw. We have two choices. We can say, “No, no, let’s just wait for the election to happen. If it’s Biden, well, it’s all over anyway. And if it’s Trump, well, then we’re ready to deal with the left.”

That’s wrong. The moment we say that, we’ve already yielded to the mob’s veto. Americans in 2018 gave Trump a Senate majority because he promised to give us a non-activist Supreme Court that’s guided by the Constitution, not Das Kapital, as run through a modern “social justice” filter. We’ve still got that president and that Congress for a few more months and we should get what’s promised. Yes, the left will run amok but we have to stand up to them. Otherwise, America becomes Mogadishu. The blackmail of violence has got to end.

11. I think Trump needs to nominate Amy Coney Barrett. As far as I know, in addition to being a superb judge in the strict constructionist mode, she’s as pure as the driven snow. The only way the left can attack her is that she’s Catholic, and I don’t think American voters outside of the leftist Swamp will like that approach.

What say you?

Is this idea about the origin of the Wuhan virus too off the wall?

Could China have created the Wuhan virus to provide a little extra breathing room in its socialized medicine and welfare systems?

I already know that this idea is far-fetched, but it formed in my mind so perfectly that I had to run with it. I’ll make this brief because there’s really not much to say.

According to Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Hong Kong virologist who claims to be on the run from the Communist powers in Beijing, the Chinese military created the Wuhan virus as a deliberate weapon of war.

However, in a post at Red State, Michael Thau thinks something more complicated is going on. He points out that the normally secretive Chinese government went out of its way to promote to Westerners how dangerous this mysterious new virus was. That being the case, it’s strange that Dr. Yan said that the virus was a deliberately released bioweapon:

[I]f what Dr. Yan is saying is true, the enthusiasm Chinese authorities showed for hyping the virus is tough to explain.

You’d think that they’d want to keep their bioweapon a secret, so it does as much damage as possible before it’s detected.

Why would the CCP want to identify the bioweapon they’d unleashed and its Chinese origins months before it even struck its targets? For that matter, why would they release it in China first and let it make its way to the West, instead of starting it off in one of the countries they were targeting?

Thau thinks that Yan, who seems remarkably insouciant about the safety of her friends and family back in Hong Kong, may not be an enemy of the CCP. Instead, she might be an agent, pushing the CCP’s preferred narrative. Thau thinks that the Chinese wanted a global lockdown and built up a fake narrative to create one.

I think Thau might be on to something, although I come at it from a slightly different angle, and my angle can have Dr. Yan being a patsy, not an agent. Here goes:

If I wanted to destroy the world and had the ability to manufacture a targeted virus, I would make a virus that replicates the Spanish Influenza: That virus was not only exceptionally contagious and lethal, it also targeted hardest the young and healthy. A virus that wipes out the workers would be the virus most likely to destroy the world. As a second-tier goal, I would engineer the virus so that it didn’t affect Han people, who are the preferred ethnicity in China.

Once the virus had run its course, China would be the last nation standing, just as America was after World War II. China would have effectively won a world war without firing a shot. The Chinese era would begin, with the Han dominant in China. That’s what I would do.

Instead, though, if China did indeed engineer a virus, it engineered a virus that takes down the old and sick. That’s not a great weapon. It’s a terrible bioweapon.

However, a disease that specifically targets old and sick people is a useful tool for a socialist country that has a surfeit of old and sick people burdening the medical and welfare systems. We already know that countries such as England routinely deny treatment to the very old or the very sick. They do this because they’re no longer contributing to the system. For that reason, they’re viewed as deadweight, and not worth saving.

Remember, in socialist societies, an individual’s worth is measured, not by being a unique person made in the image of God, but by that person’s utility to the state. If you’re no longer useful and, worse, if are an economic drain on society, you’ve got to go.

So here’s my crazy theory: I think China may have engineered a virus to clean out the dead weight (i.e., old and sick people) from its population. Once having engineered the virus, though, it realized that it could get a secondary benefit from the resulting sickness. It could use scary PR about the virus — a virus that, unlike the Black Death or Spanish Influenza, will not destroy the world — to panic the rest of the world into destroying itself.

How’s that for a theory?

THE DEMS AND THEIR BILLIONAIRE MASTERS ARE BRILLIANT AND WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE—NOT!

ARTICLE BY JEFFREY A. FRIEDBERG

Jeffrey A Friedberg - AI Experiment 51
Jeffrey A Friedberg – AI Experiment 51

.

I have never in my very long life seen such dumb bastards as the democrats and their billionaire masters.

What—-

…they really think Nancy Pelosi or Kamala Harris will be allowed to take up bludgeons of Communist rule in the Oval Office?

They really think rioting and looting and burning things down is the way to win?

Do they not understand that by November 4, 2020, all 530 or so of them will probably be hiding under some mountain someplace?

Do they not understand that they will not be able to walk a street? That they will be prisoners of their own guards under that mountain?

That it will not be “business as usual?”

That they will have to stop singing; stop throwing balls at hoops; and stop running around?

Don’t they understand they will not be able to leave their democrat-run cities? That their refuges will crash burning around them. And they shall have nowhere to go?

Worst of all: haven’t the democrats and their European masters figured it out yet? That a Conservative leader and hero will be born from their own democrat chaos?

That the hero exists at this moment, right now, and does not even know It? Leadership by example; by commitment; by nobility; and by countenance?

Because there is yet no actual leader manifested for conservatives. Nobody speaks And acts for them.

Except maybe Trump. But Trumps hands are tied by Presidentiality. By writings, traditions, wise men, and their enforcers.

No. The leader is not President Trump.

The conservatives’ leader will emerge from chaos, hurling voice and vision as weapons. Raging personality will burn like forged steel. Commitment will be a new dawn. Anger, wrath, and vengeance will be like blazing sleet in the face of all enemies—both foreign and domestic.

.

 

 

 

 

Conservatives Must Be Ready to Sacrifice Everything

**NOTE:  for one so obviously younger than people like me, GAVIN WAX seems almost like a reincarnated Thomas Payne, or some other real hero of 1776 – JAF

<<—————————————–>>

Conservatives Must Be Ready to Sacrifice Everything

ARTICLE APPEARED FIRST IN TOWNHALL.COM, BY:

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Conservatives Must Be Ready to Sacrifice Everything

Source: AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

A literal coup d’état – a bloody revolution against the American system – to depose President Trump and prevent a second term at all costs is looking like a foregone conclusion heading into November.

Reporting from the pro-Trump news aggregation site, Revolver News showed that the so-called Transition Integrity Project (TIP) is filled with Soros-backed operatives and Never Trumpers. Despite the obviously partisan nature of the project, it is being heralded as unbiased and non-partisan. Public policy is being crafted based on TIP’s recommendation to “secure the vote,” ie. doing everything possible to make sure Trump is not the winner.

The shadowy Democrat operative John Podesta, paying the role of Biden, refused to concede during a TIP wargaming exercise simulating election scenarios. He went as far to start a civil war while roleplaying as Biden in this theoretical exercise, suggesting that millions of deaths would be worth it to stop the American people from making the wrong choice. Similarly, Hillary Clinton has implored Biden to refuse to concede on election day, even if he gets drubbed by Trump at the polls. This is how reasonable Democrats protect Democracy™ against the pesky will of the people.

Opinion columnist David Brooks laid out the scenario in the New York Times of what happens if President Trump “doesn’t leave” the White House after the election. This is laying the groundwork for Trump to be removed if there is a tremendous amount of election fraud, which could very well be the case due to widespread mail-in voting, and the election is ultimately disputed. Brooks is giving marching orders to the hordes on what must be done in order to ensure that Trump cannot get a second term no matter what the people decide.

Vice Presidential wannabe Sen. Kamala Harris actually helped raise bail funds to get looters, murderers and terrorists back on the streets of Minneapolis while the riots were at their peak following the drug overdose death of violent felon George Floyd. Since becoming vice president, she has not relented – making an appearance on Late Show with Stephen Colbert to endorse the sustained violence and promise that it will continue until the election and beyond.

“They’re not going to stop before election day in November, and they’re not going to stop after election day, and everyone should take note of that on both levels that they’re not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not,” Harris said.

BLM leaders are proud marxists openly agitating for an overthrow of the capitalist system. And nobody seems to care or notice. Well, perhaps some of the commoners in flyover country care, but they’re in the process of being replaced by a third-world foreigner so their opinion does not matter much. Nobody in any serious position of authority within the federal government cares, certainly not Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham, who have been criticized by Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch for their non-investigationinto deep state crimes. Despite Barr’s public pronouncements, his agents are more focused on going after former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, and regularly makes excuses for ANTIFAwhile profiling supposed white supremacists as being the real domestic terror threat.

Our elected officials will not be saving us from the onslaught. It is not difficult to comprehend how the fake news media, which has lied about Russia, Ukraine, COVID-19, Black Lives Matter, and virtually everything else, could gin up another deception to cast the election into doubt even if Trump is the winner. These left-wing revolutionaries are remarkably brazen in their scheming to influence an election, stoke racial divisions, turn cities into dust, create an orgy of mayhem, and rip up the Bill of Rights and Constitution. This is who they are, who they always were, and who they always will be. But what are conservatives doing in response to this?

Sure, we all like to wave the flag and talk about how much we love our country, but what are we willing to do to actually protect it?

Unlike liberals, conservatives have the perspective to be able to enjoy and be thankful for their blessings. They are not constantly envious of their fellow man. They appreciate the privilege of living in a first-world Western country with the rule of law, private property rights, individual liberty, and the relative safety of their families. However, appreciation for these first-world amenities can become a false idol when they are cherished above all else. Too many Americans have become fat and happy with the good life; losing touch with the necessities of sacrifice and struggle. They are living their credit financed American dream, accumulating a great deal of material wealth, at the expense of the nation.

The Founding Fathers were men of nobility who were living incredibly well under the British crown, but they yearned for something more. They were not willing to look the other way as their liberties were deprived from them. They were willing to sacrifice everything to even have a chance at true liberty. Was their revolution perfect? Of course not. Was it one of the greatest acts to promote human freedom in world history? Yes, indubitably so.

It is true that King George, in comparison to the tyrants of today, seems pretty fair-minded by comparison. The tinpot despots of yesteryear never could have fathomed the ghastly bureaucratic monstrosity that lords over us today. However, the Founders were not willing to cede an inch to those who were oppressing them. The small group of patriots, guided by the provincial hand of God, were able to drag a captive population into a revolution that seemed so improbable as to be foolhardy. And yet, they achieved absolute victory, a fact that sticks in the craw of those who would wish to yield absolute state power to this very day.

The Founders achieved absolute victory because they were bold and fearless. Modern conservatives must be similarly bold and willing to sacrifice everything to stop their civilization from collapsing. The Left has already declared war. They are coming for everything. And because of the institutional systemic racism by the privileged white male patriarchy, or whatever, they have an unquenchable moral imperative to burn, loot and murder. After the Biden administration brings over 50 million or so climate refugees, not even the suburbs will be safe from the chaos.

The amenities of the first-world nation may still be intact but they are illusory. They are the spoils of a sinister, globalist-dominated system, which requires decent people to tolerate corruption, filth and decadence in order to sustain it. Americans have been bought off with luxuries and distractions. They have looked the other way while their nation has been devastated, taking a laissez-faire approach to their sacred birthright at their great peril. But there is one more chance to renew the country; however, the chance will not be around for long and will come at a substantial cost. If conservatives are not willing to consider this option, the Republic will be lost forever.

.

“Kill ALL The Jews!” – Jihadwatch.org, by the great Robert Spencer.

THE GREAT ROBERT SPENCER

Robert Spencer

<<———————————————->>

NYC: Muslim doctor called on people to spit on ‘Jew dogs,’ beat up Zionists, yet is allowed to treat Jewish patients

“The hospital discovered his social media rants and last year tried to fire Khass from his position as a pediatric resident, however, Khass took them to court and won his job back claiming the hospital wrongly fired him for violating his ‘freedom of speech.’”

That’s ridiculous. I’m a free speech absolutist, but there is no doubt that no one has the freedom or the right to call for harming other people. This man is supposed to be a doctor, but what will he do if he has a Jewish, Zionist, or Christian patient? He should not just be fired from New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital; he should be barred from practicing medicine immediately.

SEE ALL OF JIHADWATCH.ORG ARTICLES HERE

“‘Beat Up Zionists’: NY Doctor Tweets Violent Anti-Semitic Incitement, Permitted to Treat Jews,” by Yakir Benzion, United With Israel, September 13, 2020:

For the past two years New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital has been trying to fire a doctor with a history of posting anti-Semitic and violently anti-Israel messages on social media.

Next week, the hospital and Dr. Walid Khass will be back in court to address the doctor’s eight-year history of tweets denigrating Jews and calling for Israel’s destruction.

Before Khass was hired as a resident at the hospital, his reputation for virulently anti-Israel social media activity was known.

As far back as 2012, Khass tweeted “My beloved Palestine! Spit on you, Jew dogs!” His tweets continued as a medical student until his graduation from St. George’s University (SGU) School of Medicine in June 2019, reported Canary Mission, a watchdog organization that tracks anti-Semitism on campuses….

On August 1, 2014, Khass tweeted: “quran chapter 2 take not the christians and the jews for friends — I’m Muslim And Know This.”

On November 13, 2014, Khass tweeted: “Go Beat Up A Zionist, You’re Not You When You Don’t Beat Up A Zionist.”

His tweets are also racist including one on July 10, 2015, in which he said: “Israel Needs To Stop Payin Ethiopians To Pretend That They’re Jewish Just So They Can Have A Bigger Population.”

On February 9, 2017, Khass tweeted: “Trump Trust Me, The Only People Ruining Our Country Is The Zionist Israeli’s …. #FreePalestine.”

The Canary Mission website lists at least 57 tweets by Khass that call for violence, spread anti-Semitism, support the Hamas terror group, and spread hatred of Israel and calls for its destruction.

The hospital discovered his social media rants and last year tried to fire Khass from his position as a pediatric resident, however, Khass took them to court and won his job back claiming the hospital wrongly fired him for violating his “freedom of speech.”…

.

Jews Who Hate Trump and Do Not Know Why [But Are Headed To “A Firing Squad,” Anyway. Again.]

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/4203703/jewish/Whats-Up-With-Orthodox-Men-and-Women-and-the-Handshake.htm
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/4203703/jewish/Whats-Up-With-Orthodox-Men-and-Women-and-the-Handshake.htm
Amish (again!), Jews, Christians Riot ? - https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/08/berkeley-riots-antifa.jpg?quality=90&strip=all
Amish (again!), Jews, Christians Riot ? – https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/08/berkeley-riots-antifa.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

<<—————————————>>

.

THIS ARTICLE APPEARED FIRST IN AMERICANTHINKER.COM

By Alexander G. Markovsky and Ted Belman

Jews Who Hate Trump and Do Not Know Why

It is given that the plurality of Jews wouldn’t vote for Donald J. Trump even if Moses endorsed him. We shouldn’t look for logic here. As prominent Zionist Max Nordau once observed, “logic is a Greek art and Jews can’t tolerate it”.

Tom Teicholz, the author of the new book The Worst President Ever.: Prominent Republican and Former Trump Administration Officials Speak Out Against Trump, is not an exception. In it, rather than support his case, he offers an unending barrage of selective opinions of Trump opponents and disgruntled former employees who for the most part criticize the President’s intimidating personality and abrasive style.

Having said this, we agree with him that Donald J. Trump is the worst president ever… for the Democrats/socialists.

When it comes to the substance however, “the worst president ever,” is striving for new world order reversing his predecessors’ embrace of globalism, Islamism and Iran. His building blocks include a restored military, energy independence, defended borders, and notwithstanding a temporary setback caused by Coronavirus, a robust economy, not seen since the tenure of Dwight Eisenhower. This surfeit of blessing allows Trump to conduct economic and foreign policies in a manner previously unavailable to his predecessors since the decade following World War II.  

In effect, he ushered in a New Age of Nationalism which horrified his critics, especially Jews, who had spent the last 80 years decrying Nationalism as an evil rather than a good. Whereas,  Zionism was born in the age of Nationalism and has remained true to its origins.

Overall, his critics failed to grasp the essence and the benefits of Trump’s statecraft and foreign policy based on raison d’état — national interests.

The list of President Trump’s accomplishments is well beyond the scope of this article, so we limit them to the “Jewish issues.”  

President Trump became the first US president to visit the Western (aka, “Wailing”) Wall

YouTube screengrab

At the beginning of Trump presidency America expected an era of protracted confrontation with the Arab World. Toward the end of his first term, America is expecting an era of peace. He accomplished this coming down decidedly in Israel’s favor thereby convincing the Arabs that it was futile to resist Israel.

Trump’s the Middle East peace initiative is rival to Theodore Roosevelt’s balance-of-power diplomacy during the mediation of the Treaty of Portsmouth for which he was awarded the Noble Peace Prize.

Obama had alienated the Arabs by embracing the Mullahs of Iran and entering the nuclear deal known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Trump withdrew from the deal and spent the last 3.5 years pushing Iran back thereby endearing himself to the Arabs who consider Iran a mortal enemy. Trump skillfully leveraged the USA position to induce collaboration between Israelis and Arabs against their common danger.

In the process, Trump:

  • Defunded the Palestinian authority and removed them from Washington;
  • Defunded UNWRA and put into question the multi-generational refugee status;
  • Recognized Israel sovereignty over the Golan;
  • Recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US embassy there; and finally
  • Tabled the Trump Plan, Peace to Prosperity, which was decidedly better for Israel than the Arab Peace Initiative, first tabled in 2002.

The publicized criticism of Trump is a surrogate for a deep underlying ideological divide in America. The old adage, “There are two types of Jews — those who believe that Judaism is about social justice and those who know Hebrew,” perfectly reflects the current political environment.

The idea of social justice, in terms of helping the sick and the poor, is deeply embedded in Judaism. Living in ghettos and being persecuted for two millennia, the Jewish people have been struggling to reconcile their tragic history with contemporary reality. The experience has led them to take on and support the cause of every underdog and liberal movement in sight, no matter how unworthy, no matter how illogical or no matter how it imperiled their own interests or safety.

This is referred to as Tikkun Olam in the Talmud. Those who know Hebrew, know that it is an activity aimed at completing God’s work. Those who don’t know Hebrew divorce this activity from completing God’s work and think of it as a good in and of itself. Their divine mission is to change society upon their verities. This phenomenon explains why Orthodox Jews by and large voted for Trump in 2016 and are expected to vote for him in 2020 even in greater numbers.

The social justice crowd is not motivated by concerns for Israel and they are not motivated by the interests of the United States. Their obsession is social justice which they believe is not currently available. They believe that this can best be achieved through socialism and wealth redistribution.

This Party is determined to become the ruling party once again, through any means including making false accusations, fabricating or destroying evidence and election fraud.

Tom Teicholz, uses a pen, the others, such as the Jewish Community Action, a Minnesota-based group, are actively participating in demonstrations and riots in support of the so-called racial justice and economic equality.

https://thejewishvoice.com/2019/01/new-study-shows-holocaust-was-likely-the-swiftest-killing-campaign-in-history/
https://thejewishvoice.com/2019/01/new-study-shows-holocaust-was-likely-the-swiftest-killing-campaign-in-history/

Some wealthy Jews, in an act of colossal memory loss, sponsor Antifa and Black Lives Matter just like their ancestors who financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.  They forget, if they ever knew, that their ancestors ended up facing a firing squad of triumphant socialism. Thus they support a party whose every postulate is a fraud: 

  • Systemic racism is a fraud — the country that elected a black president twice cannot be racist
  • Black Lives Matter doesn’t matter in Chicago, Detroit and other cities controlled by the Democrats
  • Economic equality can only occur in poverty
  • The Democrats’ policy of open borders or no borders is designed to open our country to a tsunami of immigrants with morals and values diametrically opposed to those of Americans, ultimately making the United States of America not united, not states, and not even American
  • Attacks on law enforcement are an attempt create anarchy and dismantle the existing system of authority
  • The so-called victims of police brutality are predominantly habitual criminals and drug addicts
  • Racial inequality is the only correct postulate – the Affirmative Action is a form of racial privileges
  • They forget how good America was for Jews for 150 years and instead chase the false God of Socialism.
  • The Chosen People have chosen the wrong side of history again.

Alexander G. Markovsky is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, a conservative think hosted at King’s College, New York City, which examines national security, energy, risk-analysis and other public policy issues, He is the author of “Anatomy of a Bolshevik” and “Liberal Bolshevism: America Did Not Defeat Communism, She Adopted It. He is the owner and CEO of Litwin Management Services, LLC. He can be reached at info@litwinms.com. Ted Belman is the founder and publisher of Israpundit.org

.